They were bought and sold as if they were mules. They were packed into ships against their will, like meat. Riehl, with slavery, Africans were kidnapped from their homes, from halfway across the world. Now - and I can’t believe I even have to do this - let’s talk about fucking slavery. No compared to actual slavery such as was the case in the U.S. And to the extent that forced labor is a problem, a well run guest worker program and an amnesty plan for those already here would solve that issue to a large extent as well. In fact, anti-illegal immigration folks like Michelle Malkin frequently enjoy pointing out that illegal immigrants aren’t “in the shadows” (and hence not likely to be subject to forced labor). To be sure there are cases of forced labor even the U.S., however, from what I have been able to find so far, such cases are more the exception than the rule. Not quite in line with the definition of slavery.
#Private contact employment illegal imigration free#
They are free to spend their money as they see fit.They can live where the please (and can afford),.They can leave that job and look for another,.They voluntarily take a job that a employer voluntarily offers to pay,.They come to this country voluntarily (albeit illegally, and often at risk to their lives),.However, most illegal immigrants satisfy the following list: Here the assertion is merely made that illegal immigrants are equivalent to or the “next best thing to” slaves. The net effect would at best be hard to determine, but the problem with the “illegal immigration = new slavery” crowd is that they don’t even make a casual attempt to determine the effect, they merely assume that the effect is large and negative and thus they are allowed to make the connection to slavery.ĭan Riehl doesn’t even offer the sophistication we got from DiRito.īetween special interest groups served by a growing underclass and big business special interests intent on maintaining a steady supply of cheap labor, it’s apparent to many in this debate who has the interests of America in their heart … and who is simply looking for access to the 2006 equivalent of, or next best thing to slaves. Hardly a recipe for promoting poverty level wages. The idea here is that the unskilled immigrant laborer allows the skilled laborer to devote less time to unskilled labor activities and more time to skilled labor activities thereby raising the incomes of the skilled laborer. That is, the addition of additional unskilled labor allows for people with high labor skills to earn more. Further, there is the possibility that unskilled labor from illegal immigrants is a complement for high skilled labor. So the idea that illegal immigration “promotes poverty” is a dubious position with, at best, weak evidence (so far). Although it is possible that instead of illegal immigration impacting wages, it operates through unemployment–i.e., the rate of unemployment rises for natives as illegal immigration rises. To some extent this could be true, but this still leaves out the big question of what kind of impact does illegal immigration have on wages? There is research that suggests that the impact of illegal immigration on wages is small.
One could take the approach that border security was allowed to go lax so that business could have an influx of cheap labor. This completely ignores that supply and demand actually determine the wage rate, and individual employers tend to have little control over wages (if the opposite were true, you wouldn’t get a raise next time such things come around and you wouldn’t be able to leave since the next employer would either offer the same wage or a lower one). That profits are basically taken from labor, and if it weren’t for the evil capitalists, the laborers would get that profit in the form of higher wages. This is basically the same kind of thinking that Karl Marx used. The problem here is with the last part, promoting poverty level wages. He then goes on to try and argue that the American economy, by design, has let in illegal immigrants merely as a means “to bolster corporate profit” by promoting “poverty level wages”. He notes that one definition of slavery is the “submission to a dominating influence”. To come to the conclusion that illegal immigration is a new form of slavery we have to go through some amzaing mental gyrations (which are taking place on both the Left and the Right).ĭaniel DiRito makes a game attempt at this redefinition. Slavery, as it has been seen historically is the outright ownership of one person by another. The idea that illegal immigration is the new slavery of the 21st century is a risable notion.
0 kommentar(er)
